What exactly is a GONGO?

When I first came across the term GONGO, or “government-organized non-governmental organization”, I was perplexed by the rather oxymoronic combination of the term. Isn’t a non-governmental organization supposed to be non-governmental? How are they different from typical NGOs?

When I first came across the term GONGO, or “government-organized non-governmental organization”, I was perplexed by the rather oxymoronic combination of the term. Isn’t a non-governmental organization supposed to be non-governmental? How are they different from typical NGOs? And since GONGOs are effectively an extension of the government body, what is their role in the civil society?

First, let’s look at the definitions. Theoretically, GONGOs are typically established, funded, staffed, and governed by the government, hence the “GO”-of GONGO. NGOs, as a contrast, tend to be established independently and are less reliant on government funding. They hire their own staff and are independently run and managed. But when it comes to GONGOs, the distinction between the two becomes blurred. In today’s world, with ever more complex social challenges, collaboration across sectors is important and necessary. This trend also blurs the line between government, and the private and social sectors.

GONGOs are generally created by governments to carry out a certain social or political agenda and have been established across a range of government types. They can play a useful role in society. In Germany, for instance, the government promotes and sponsors citizens’ initiatives and counter-mobilizations against far-right extremist groups under initiatives labeled as “Kampf gegen Rechts” (Fight the Right).[1] These initiatives help to strengthen democracy and the people’s voice.

In Asia, many GONGOs stay away from politics and play more of a social delivery role. GONGOs can be like other NGOs as social service providers, and there are ample examples of that in China. China Youth Development Foundation, which is known for its education programs for rural youth, such as Project Hope, is a case in point. That said, the situation can become a bit tricky when GONGOs dominate the third sector. Because of GONGOs’ principal-agent relationship with the government, GONGOs are more likely to work aligned with government agendas and less likely to be critical of government policies—at least not explicitly.

While there are positive aspects of close alignment with government, GONGOs can also diminish an independent voice as well as solutions that may adhere less closely with government guidelines.

In China, nonprofits intend to carry out charitable activities that fall under the remit of the Charity Law. Certification as charities can be applied if they have a mission of carrying out charitable activities and aim to work on certain permitted areas of social issues. These include poverty alleviation and assistance; care of elders, orphans and the ill, and assistance for the disabled; natural and emergency disaster relief, public health incidents, and other emergencies; promotion of education, science, culture, health, and sports; prevention of environmental risks, and protection and improvement of the environment; and other public interest activities permitted by the law.[2]

It is also worthy to note that China is the biggest procurer of social services from social delivery organizations (SDOs)[3] in Asia. According to the Doing Good Index 2020, 63% of SDOs receive government contracts in China, compared to the Asian average of 26%.[4] For NGOs, while sustained government funding ensures alignment with government priorities and a sustainable income stream, it also means they essentially become de-facto GONGOs. This is something that could have important implications for the development of the third sector, and the wider civil society in China.

 

[1] Merkel, W. (n.d.). Political regimes and state‐sponsored contentious politics: What’s new? Projects at Harvard. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/mobilized_contention/files/wmerkel_gongos_2.pdf

[2] Ministry of Justice, the People’s Republic of China. (2020, Feb. 14). 中华人民共和国慈善法. [Charity Law of the People’s Republic of China]. http://www.moj.gov.cn/subject/content/2020-02/14/1449_3241663.html

[3] In the Doing Good Index, we use “social delivery organization” (SDO) to refer to organizations that deliver a product or service to address societal needs. We refrain from using the term “nonprofits” because many organizations nowadays include a for-profit or social enterprise arm, and that many of them in Asia are affiliated with the government. For more detail, please refer to page 6 of the Doing Good Index 2020.

[4] Centre for Asian Philanthropy and Society (CAPS). (2020). Doing Good Index 2020 – profiling Asia’s social sector: the path forward. https://caps.org/our-research/doing-good-index-2020/

 

Latest Insights +

India’s CSR law: A national experiment to drive social development

In 2013, India put in place one of the most progressive laws around corporate social responsibility (CSR). However, six years on the law has fallen short in driving collective national progress. One reason for this is that a large proportion of funding is flowing to a small proportion of states. 

疫情过后对中国第三部门的几点思考

社会组织,或者在中国常提及的第三部门,应该在社会中发挥怎样的作用?这次前所未有的疫情危机清楚表明,政府和私营部门不能满足所以的市场和社会需求,在一个运行健全的社会体系中,第三部门必不可缺。从对部分中国基金会的访谈和媒体报道的观察中,我们看到了社会组织迸发出来的创造力和巨大的潜力。然而,尽管其重要性似乎毋庸置疑,其发展和定位却颇具曲折。